Thursday · 17 September 2026
BREAKINGWhy Are Girls’ Shorts So Much Shorter? Parents Are Questioning the Gender Divide in Children’s Clothing12:05 updated
Home/Career & Money
Article2 min read
Deep Read Article Context · Evidence · Analysis
Career & MoneySheFront

Victoria’s Work-From-Home Bill Moves Toward a Decisive Vote

Australia’s Victoria state is advancing a statutory right to work remotely for up to two days where reasonable, after delaying commencement and revising costs for employers. The design could help caregivers while preserving a divide between remote-capable and frontline work.

Written bySheFront Editor ✓Community Contributor
Published 8 September 2026 · English · Europe · Austria News Image Card !Report

MELBOURNE, Australia — Victoria’s government says its work-from-home bill will clear parliament this week, reviving a reform that had been delayed after business opposition.

The Equal Opportunity Amendment (Work from Home) Bill has already passed the Legislative Assembly and is before the Legislative Council. It would give eligible full-time workers a right to work remotely for up to two days a week when the job can reasonably be performed away from the workplace, with pro-rata treatment for eligible part-time and regular casual staff.

Premier Ben Carroll said on 7 September that amendments would make the measure more practical for employers. Earlier plans for a September start were pushed to July 2027 while the government consulted further. The bill’s official parliamentary page should be checked after the vote for the final text and commencement provisions.

The reform matters to women because unpaid care remains unevenly distributed. Removing several commutes can make school collection, medical appointments and paid work easier to combine. It may also help disabled workers and people living far from employment centres.

Remote work is not automatically equality. Women working from home can be assigned more domestic labour, overlooked for promotion or excluded from informal decisions. Employers need performance measures based on outcomes, equal access to important meetings and transparent promotion data by work pattern.

There is also a class and occupation divide. Nurses, cleaners, retail staff, construction workers and many carers cannot do their jobs from home. A remote-work right should not become a benefit financed by lower-paid workers who must remain on site. Governments and employers should pair flexibility with predictable schedules, paid leave and transport support for jobs requiring presence.

The bill uses reasonableness rather than an absolute entitlement. That makes the dispute process crucial. Employers should give written reasons for refusal, and workers need a route to conciliation without risking retaliation. Small businesses will need clear guidance on equipment, cybersecurity and occupational safety.

Until the upper-house vote is completed, Victorians do not have a final new right. The government’s confidence is politically significant but not a substitute for enacted law.

If passed with workable safeguards, the measure could shift remote work from a managerial favour to an employment standard. Its equality value will be measured by who can use it without paying a wage or career penalty—and what protections are offered to everyone whose work can never be done from a spare room.

Sources & references
01
The Guardian Australia
Filed underCareer and money
About the contributor

SheFront Editor ✓

SheFront Editor — can create, edit, review, approve and publish stories.

Community

Join the discussion

Comments are moderated.
The SheFront Brief

Women at the frontlines of what’s next.

A global online community amplifying women’s voices, stories, and leadership.